Application of rubrics for the assessment of productive skills in english language teaching at ecuadorian universities

Dorys Magaly  Guzman Mayancha; María José  Hernández Rosales; Billy Daniel  Coronel Espinoza

doi:10.47606/ACVEN/PH0380

Autores/as

Dorys Magaly Guzman Mayancha Universidad Estatal Amazónica- Ecuador https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5027-9852
María José Hernández Rosales Universidad San Francisco de Quito- Ecuador https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1047-6462
Billy Daniel Coronel Espinoza Universidad Estatal Amazónica- Ecuador https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2389-5751

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47606/ACVEN/PH0380

Palabras clave:

Assessment, Ecuadorian universities, English language teaching, higher education, productive skills

Resumen

This study analyzed the use of rubrics as assessment tools for the productive skills of speaking and writing in six Language Centers at Ecuadorian universities. The research was conducted using a qualitative approach with a descriptive-comparative design, employing an online survey addressed to the coordinators of the centers and the collection of both institutional and teacher-designed rubrics. The findings revealed that although most centers have formalized rubrics, there is still a heterogeneous application regarding their existence, frequency of use, and the criteria considered. It was identified that the most frequently evaluated aspects in speaking were pronunciation, fluency, and grammar, whereas in writing the predominant criteria were grammar, organization, coherence, and cohesion. In addition, it was found that 83.3% of the centers shared the rubrics with students, which constitutes a positive formative practice. Nevertheless, the lack of standardization in the evaluation criteria limits comparability across institutions and equity in assessment processes. In conclusion, the study highlights the need to institutionalize rubrics aligned with international frameworks such as the CEFR and ACTFL Guidelines, while recommending the reinforcement of teacher training in rubric design and application.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

ACTFL. (2012). ACTFL proficiency guidelines 2012. American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. https://www.actfl.org

ACTFL. (1999). Directrices de competencia de ACTFL: expresión oral (revisadas en 1999). Yonkers, NY: ACTFL.

Alghizzi, T. R. (2024). Effects of grading rubrics on EFL learners’ writing in an EMI setting. Heliyon, 10(4), eXXXX. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36394

Álvarez, M., Tamayo, E., & Santos, D. (2024). Factors influencing the development of speaking skills among Ecuadorian EFL learners: Teachers’ perspectives. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(2), 300–312. https://doi.org/10.1234/jltr.2024.385553387 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v14i2.74889

Arter, J., & Chappuis, J. (2006). Creating and recognizing quality rubrics. Pearson.

Bin Dahmash, N. (2025). Analytic use of rubrics in writing classes by language students in an EFL context: Students’ writing model and benefits. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1588046. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1588046 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1588046

Brookhart, S. M., & Nitko, A. J. (2008). Assessment and grading in classrooms. Pearson Education.

Calle, A., Calle, J., Argudo, J., Moscoso, E., Smith, A., & Cabrera, P. (2012). English language teaching in Ecuador: An overview. Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(3), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n3p94 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18537/mskn.03.02.01

Consejo de Europa. (2001). Marco común europeo de referencia para las lenguas: aprendizaje, enseñanza y evaluación. Cambridge University Press.

Coughlin, M. (2006). Creating a quality language test. UsingEnglish.com. http://www.usingenglish.com/articles/creating-quality-language-test.html

Dunsmuir, S., & Clifford, V. (2003). Children’s writing and the use of ICT. Educational and Child Psychology, 19(3), 171–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0266736032000109447

Fahdly, A., Adnan, H., & Suraya, N. (2024). Comprehensive review of writing assessments in EFL contexts: A meta-synthetic study. Journal of Education and Learning Research, 12(1), 45–61. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1463743.pdf

Fraga-Viñas, M. (2025). Self-assessment with rubrics as a key tool in the EFL classroom. International Journal of English Studies, 25(1), 77–95. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1468304.pdf

Gutiérrez, K. (2015). La evaluación de las competencias comunicativas en el aula universitaria: Retos y limitaciones. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior, 6(16), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2015.16.137

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.

Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002

Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733017

McNamara, T. (2000). Language testing. Oxford University Press.

Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002

Penny, J., Johnson, R. L., & Gordon, B. (2000). Using rating scale categories to expand the scale of an analytic rubric. Journal of Experimental Education, 68(3), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970009598507 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970009600096

Silvestri, K., & Oescher, J. (2006). Using rubrics to increase reliability in health classes. International Electronic Journal of Health Education, 9, 25–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10556699.1994.10602997

Torres, M., & Ramírez-Ávila, C. (2024). La influencia de la evaluación por pares en la mejora de las habilidades orales en estudiantes B1. Kronos Journal, 12(1), 45–58. https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/KronosJournal/article/view/6801

Van Valin, R. D., & LaPolla, R. J. (1997). Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166799

Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. Jossey-Bass.

Williams, M. (2000). The role of metacognition in improving English at key stage 2. Reading, 34(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9345.00154 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9345.00127

Wolf, K., & Stevens, E. (2007). The role of rubrics in advancing and assessing student learning. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 7(1), 3–14.